Build up to WW3 ~ Obama Pushing US Into WW3

I'm so confused. Let me get this straight - Killing people with missiles, bombs, and bullets is OK but killing them with chemicals is not, and killing them with missiles, bombs and bullets is even more OK when your killing them BECAUSE they killed with chemicals? I fail to see the logic. Oh wait...I forgot to factor in the desire for world domination, oil, and the bragging right to proclaim "king of the global mountain." NOW I get it! (kind of)

Rush Limbaugh : Media Trying to 'Protect' Obama From His Own 'Red Line' in Syria

8/27/13 - Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh criticized the political press for engaging in what he called an effort to "water down" what President Barack Obama meant when he said that chemical weapons use in Syria represented a "red line" for the United States. The host cited news outlets which are interpreting Obama's "red line" to mean something less consequential than a military response.

"A red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized," Obama said in the summer of 2012.

"Now, the grey area there is translating what 'a whole bunch' means," Limbaugh said. "And that's where they're going to play games here."

Limbaugh cited some media reports which provided the government with a more ambiguous reading of Obama's "red line." He identified ABC News as one outlet which was actively trying "to get Obama out of this jam" by liberally interpreting what Obama's "red line" meant.

"So, even when Obama says he's being very clear, he's being too nuanced for us mere mortals," Limbaugh observed.

"Now, how can we be sure that Obama isn't trying to get us into yet another war?" the host asked. "Remember, Obama needs to distract people from his domestic agenda falling apart — well, falling apart from our perspective. From his perspective, it's right on schedule."

But he still needs people distracted from it. People don't like what's happening. They don't yet associate Obama with it. You know that drill. But even, so Obama doesn't want to run the risk that at some point people are going to associate what's happening with him, so just keep people distracted. It's exactly what he accused Bush of doing.

This is How Sean Hannity Thinks World War III Will Start

8/27/13 - With the beating of war drums growing louder as the United States weighs intervention in the Syrian civil war, some are beginning to consider how intervention would impact America's relationship with other nations which have an interest in preserving the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria. On Tuesday, conservative radio host and Fox News Channel host Sean Hannity warned his audience that he could see the contours of a third world war that could triggered by U.S. intervention in Syria.

"If you read about World War I and you read about World War II," Hannity began, "We're going to look back through the prism of history and we're going to define this era as the rise of the radical Islamists."

"And you're seeing the formation now of what could very potentially be the next world war," Hannity warned, "because it's not just the Middle East that is radicalized."

Hannity said that Israel will eventually face a moment in which it may have to mount another multi-front war, given the radicalization of its neighbors' governments. "At some point, Israel is going to come under fire and good countries are going to have to come to its defense," Hannity said. "But it's going to be against radical Islam in all of its forms."

"You can almost see this precipitating it, if in fact the U.S. strikes," Hannity continued, "and Iran gets involved and Syria gets involved, and you're going to see countries very quickly go down the middle and start taking sides. It has the potential to powder keg."