This show looks at the phenomena of crop circles -- from a 1678
woodcarving of "mowing devils" to the growing occurrences of present day
formations both in complexity and number.
A crop circle is a
sizable pattern created by the flattening of a crop such as wheat,
barley, rye, maize, or rapeseed. Crop circles are also referred to as
crop formations because they are not always circular in shape. The
documented cases have substantially increased from the 1970s to current
times.
Twenty-six countries reported approximately 10,000 crop
circles in the last third of the 20th century; 90% of those were located
in southern England. Many of the formations appearing in that area are
positioned near ancient monuments, such as Stonehenge. According to one
study, nearly half of all circles found in the UK in 2003 were located
within a 15 km (9.3 miles) radius of Avebury. Archeological remains can
cause cropmarks in the fields in the shapes of circles and squares, but
they do not appear overnight, and they are always in the same places
every year.
Since becoming the focus of widespread media
attention in the 1980s, crop circles have become the subject of
speculation by various paranormal, ufological, and anomalistic
investigators ranging from proposals that they were created by bizarre
meteorological phenomena to messages from extraterrestrial beings. Many
crop circles have been found near ancient sites such as Stonehenge, a
prehistoric monument located in the English county of Wiltshire. They
have also been found near mounds of earth and stones raised over a grave
or graves, also known as tumuli barrows, or barrows and chalk horses,
or trenches dug and filled with rubble made from brighter material than
the natural bedrock, often chalk. There has also been speculation that
crop circles have a relation to ley lines. Many New Age groups
incorporate crop circles into their belief systems.
NEWS ON BOOZE : THE TRUTH THE NEWS WILL NOT TELL YOU . Your Source of Daily Alternative & Independent News a daily follow up of Investigative Journalists Whistleblowers Conspiracy Theorists Truthers Visionaries and Freedom Fighters . Freedom is real and attainable
Saturday, January 4, 2014
The Money Masters - the Rothschild mafia controls the Fed and the national Central Banks
Rothschild mafia John Kennedy Woodrow Wilson George Washington Andrew
Jackson Franklin Roosevelt Abraham Lincoln Bank of England US Federal
Reserve 1996 1913 full documentary
Financial Reform in a Crisis: The Swedish Solution
Whenever the question is raised about the appropriateness of the
bailouts for our largest financial institutions during the most recent
financial crisis, the usual response among people who defend the idea is
to suggest that without those bailouts we would have had a meltdown of
Great Depression-like standards. For example, former Treasury Secretary
Timothy Geithner is a prominent proponent of this view.
In one sense, the defenders are right: Allowing a wholesale collapse of the "too big to fail" banks likely would have triggered an economic disaster of incalculable consequences. But in another sense, the defenders of the post-Lehman financial reforms have established a false dichotomy. Because there was a third alternative, as Leif Pagrotsky, a Swedish Social Democratic politician who worked at the Central Bank of Sweden (the Riksbank) and in the Ministry of Finance, notes in the interview below.
Sweden did not just bail out its financial institutions by having the government take over the bad debts. It extracted pounds of flesh from bank shareholders before writing checks. Banks had to write down losses and issue warrants to the government.
This strategy held banks responsible and turned the government into an owner. When distressed assets were sold, the profits flowed to taxpayers. Plus, the government was able to recoup more money later by selling its shares in the companies as well.
In one sense, the defenders are right: Allowing a wholesale collapse of the "too big to fail" banks likely would have triggered an economic disaster of incalculable consequences. But in another sense, the defenders of the post-Lehman financial reforms have established a false dichotomy. Because there was a third alternative, as Leif Pagrotsky, a Swedish Social Democratic politician who worked at the Central Bank of Sweden (the Riksbank) and in the Ministry of Finance, notes in the interview below.
Sweden did not just bail out its financial institutions by having the government take over the bad debts. It extracted pounds of flesh from bank shareholders before writing checks. Banks had to write down losses and issue warrants to the government.
This strategy held banks responsible and turned the government into an owner. When distressed assets were sold, the profits flowed to taxpayers. Plus, the government was able to recoup more money later by selling its shares in the companies as well.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)